Difference between revisions of "Talk:DOSBox"
From Stunts Wiki
(Sort of...) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sort of... I used to run DOSBox pretty well on our other computer, a Sempron 2600+ like Chulk's, but with only 512MB RAM (processor seems to be far more critical than memory, though). Maybe I still have that config on this machine, I'll post it if I find it. Moreover, I could make it work properly on my deceased Athlon XP 2000+ (which had a mere 256MB...) - the config was not very different from the Sempron one, only with slightly less cycles, 12000 if I remember correctly. --[[User:Duplode|Duplode]] 01:18, 16 September 2008 (CEST) | Sort of... I used to run DOSBox pretty well on our other computer, a Sempron 2600+ like Chulk's, but with only 512MB RAM (processor seems to be far more critical than memory, though). Maybe I still have that config on this machine, I'll post it if I find it. Moreover, I could make it work properly on my deceased Athlon XP 2000+ (which had a mere 256MB...) - the config was not very different from the Sempron one, only with slightly less cycles, 12000 if I remember correctly. --[[User:Duplode|Duplode]] 01:18, 16 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | Edit: Found it... ;-)--[[User:Duplode|Duplode]] 01:48, 16 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 00:48, 16 September 2008
CTG: Any configurations for worse computers?
Sort of... I used to run DOSBox pretty well on our other computer, a Sempron 2600+ like Chulk's, but with only 512MB RAM (processor seems to be far more critical than memory, though). Maybe I still have that config on this machine, I'll post it if I find it. Moreover, I could make it work properly on my deceased Athlon XP 2000+ (which had a mere 256MB...) - the config was not very different from the Sempron one, only with slightly less cycles, 12000 if I remember correctly. --Duplode 01:18, 16 September 2008 (CEST) Edit: Found it... ;-)--Duplode 01:48, 16 September 2008 (CEST)
